References

Allison, P. D. & Long, J. S. (1990). Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 55(Autumn), 469—78.

Barjak, F. (2005). Research productivity in the Internet era. Series A: Discussion Paper 2005-1. Olten, C.H.4601: Solothurn University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland.

Barjak, F. (2006a). Research productivity in the Internet era. Scientometrics, 68(3), 343-60.

Barjak, F. (2006b). The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57(10), 1350-67.

Budd, J. M. (1995). Faculty publishing productivity: An institutional analysis and comparison with library and other measures. College & Research Libraries, 56(6), 547-54.

Creamer, E. G. & McGuire, S. P. (1998). Applying the cumulative advantage perspective to scholarly writers in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 73-82.

Cronin, B. & Meho, L. I. (2007). Timelines of creativity: A study of intellectual innovators in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 58(13), 1948-59.

Fonseca, L., Velloso, S., Wofchuck, S. & De Meis, L. (1997). The importance of human relationships in scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 39(2), 159-71.

Golden, J & Carstensen, F. V. (1992). Academic research productivity, department size and organisation: Further results, comment. Economics of Education Review, 11(2), 153-60.

Hartley, J. & Branthwaite, A. (1989). The psychologist as wordsmith: A questionnaire study of the writing strategies of productive British psychologists. Higher Education, 18, 423-52.

Hemlin, S. (1996). Social studies of the humanities: A case study of research conditions and performance in ancient history and classical archaeology, and English. Research Evaluation, April, 53-61.

Hemlin, S. & Gustafsson, M. (1996). Research production in the arts and humanities: A questionnaire study of factors influencing research performance. Scientometrics, 37(3), 417-32.

Hermanowicz, J. C. (2006). What does it take to be successful? Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(2), 135-52.

Holcolm, J. D., Selker, S. G. & Roush, R. E. (1990). Scholarly productivity: A regional study of physical therapy faculty in schools of allied health. Physical Therapy, 70(2), 118-24.

Kademani, B.S., Kalyane, V. L., Kumar, V. & Mohan, L (2005). Nobel laureates: Their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status. Scientometrics, 62(2), 261-8.

Kotrlik, J. W., Bartlett, J. E., Higgins, C. C. & Williams, H. A. (2002). Factors associated with research productivity of agricultural education faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(2), 1-10.

Jungnickel, P. W. & Creswell, J. W. (1994). Workplace correlates and scholarly performance of clinical pharmacy faculty. Research in Higher Education, 35(2), 167-94.

Prpic, K. (1996). Scientific fields and eminent scientists productivity patterns and factors. Scientometrics, 37(3), 445-71.

Prpic, K. (2002). Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics, 55(1), 27-58.

Randsdell, L. B., Dinger, M. K., Cooke, C. & Beske, S. (2001). Factors related to publication productivity in a sample of female health educators. American Journal of Health Behavior, 25(5), 469-80.

Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.

Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty production: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39(2), 201-22.

Tschannen-Moran, T. & Nestor-Baker, N. (2004). The tacit knowledge of productive scholars in education. Teachers College Record, 106(7), 1484-511.

Walters, M., Hunter, S. & Giddens, E. (2007). Qualitative research on what leads to success in professional writing. Retrieved 20 August 2007 from European Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 1(2), July (page numbers unspecified) (www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl).

Zainab, A. N. (1999). Personal, academic and departmental correlates of research productivity: A review of the literature. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 4(2), 73-110.

0 0

Post a comment