References

Caruso, M. & Kennedy, H. (2004). Effects of a reviewer prompting strategy on timely manuscript reviews. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(4), 523-6. Goodman, D., Dowson, S. & Yaremchuk, J. (2007). Open access and accuracy: Author-

archived manuscripts vs. published articles. Learned Publishing, 20(3), 203-15. Hernon, P. & Schwartz, C. (2005). The unsung hero to a high-quality peer review journal. Library & Information Science Research, 27(4), 421-3. Misak, A., Marusic, M. & Marusic, A. (2005). Manuscript editing as a way of teaching academic writing: Experience from a small scientific journal. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(2), 122-31. Shashok, K. & Kerans, M. E. (2000). Translating the unedited science manuscript: Who fixes what shortcomings? In J. Chabas, M. Cases & R. Glaser (Eds.), Proceedings: 1st international conference on specialized translation (pp. 101-4). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

Ware, M. (2005). Online submission andpeer review systems. Worthing: Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. Wates, E. & Campbell, R. (2007). Author's version vs. publisher's version: An analysis of the copy-editing function. Learned Publishing, 20(2) 121-9.

Chapter 4.4

0 0

Post a comment