Adams, C. (2006). PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture. Journal of Curriculum

Studies, 38(4), 398-411. Austin-Wells, V., Zimmerman, T. & McDougall, G. J. (2003). Determining an optimal delivery format for lectures targeting mature adults. Educational Gerontology, 29(6), 493-501.

Brown, L. D. (2005). The importance of circulating and presenting manuscripts: Evidence from the accounting literature. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 55-83. Drott, N. C. (1995). Re-examining the role of conference papers. Journal of the American

Society for Information Science, 46(4), 299-305. Gould, S. J. (1995). Ladders and cones: Constraining evolution by canonical icons. In Silvers, R. B. (Ed.), Hidden histories of science (pp. 37-67). New York: The New York Review of Books.

Hartley, J. (2004). On requesting conference papers electronically. Journal of Information Science, 30(5), 475-9.

Hartley, J. (2005). Refereeing and the single author. Journal of Information Science, 31(3), 251-6.

Murphy, P. K., Long, J. F., Holleran, T. A. & Esterly, E. (2003). Persuasion online or on paper: A new take on an old issue. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 511-32. Myers, G. (2000). Powerpoints: Technology, lectures and changing genres. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Analysing professional genres (pp. 177-91). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Schwartz, G. J. & Kennicutt, R. C. (2004). Demographics and citation trends in astrophysical journal papers and pre-prints. 10 November. Retrieved 3 September 2006 from

Stolk, P., Egberts, A. C. G. & Leufkens, H. G. M. (2002). Fate of abstracts presented at five international conferences on pharmacoepidemiology (ICPE): 1995—1999. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 11(2), 105—11.

Susskind, J. E. (2005). PowerPoint's power in the classroom: Enhancing students' self-efficacy and attitudes. Computers & Education, 45(2), 203—15.

Vallance, M. & Towndrow, P. A. (2007). Towards the informed use of information and communication technology in education: A response to Adams' 'PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture.' Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(2), 219—27.

Weller, A. C. (2002). Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

0 0

Post a comment