References

Chandler, D. (1995). The act of writing: A media theory approach. Aberystwyth: University of Wales.

Cotton, D. & Gresty, K. (2006). Reflecting on the think-aloud method for evaluating e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 45—54.

Coulthard, M. (2004). Author identification, idiolect, and linguistic uniqueness. Applied Linguistics, 25(4), 431-47.

Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with power (2nd edn). New York: Oxford University Press.

Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32 (June), 221-3.

Fowler, H. W. & Fowler, F. (1906). The King's English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ghiselin, B. (Ed.). (1980). The creative process: A symposium. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187-207). New York: Guilford Press.

Hartley, J. (1994). Three ways to improve the clarity of abstracts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(2), 331-43.

Hartley, J., Branthwaite, J. A., Ganier, F. & Heurley, L. (2007). Lost in translation: Contributions of translators to the meanings of text. Journal of Information Science, 35(5), 551-65.

Hartley, J., Howe, M. J. A. & McKeachie, W. J. (2001). Writing through time: Longitudinal studies of the effects of new technology on writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 141-51.

Hartley, J., Pennebaker, J. W. & Fox, C. (2003). Abstracts, introductions and discussions: How far do they differ in style? Scientometrics, 57(3), 389-98.

Hartley, J., Sotto, E. & Fox, C. (2004). Clarity across the disciplines: An analysis of texts in the sciences, social sciences, and arts and humanities. Science Communication, 26(2), 188-210.

Hartley, J, Sotto, E. & Pennebaker, J. (2002). Style and substance in psychology: Are influential articles more readable than less influential ones? Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 321-34.

Hartley, J., Trueman, M. & Meadows, A. J. (1988). Readability and prestige in scientific journals. Journal of Information Science, 14(1), 69-75.

Hayes, J. R. (2006). New directions in writing research. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 28-40). New York: Guilford Press.

Kieft, M. (2006). The effects of adapting writing instruction to students' writing strategies. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.

Klare, G. R. (1963). The measurement of readability. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

Kollberg, P. & Eklundh, K. S. (2001). Studying writers' revising patterns with S-notation analysis. In T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (pp. 89-104). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Medawar, P. (1964). Is the scientific paper a fraud? Retrieved 24 September 2006 from http://bioq.weblog.com/pt/arquivo/medawar.pdf.

Murray, R. & Moore, S. (2006). The handbook of academic writing: A fresh approach. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Oppenheimer, D. M. (2005). Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: Problems with using long words needlessly. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 139-56.

Pamuk, O. (2006). My father's suitcase. Nobel lecture, 7 December 2006. Retrieved 3 January 2007 from http://nobelprize.org.nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/2006/ pamuk-lecture_en.html.

Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E. & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reid, D. J., Briggs, N. & Beveridge, M. (1983). The effects of pictures upon the readability of a school science topic. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(3), 327-35.

Schriver, K. A. (1989). Evaluating text quality. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(4), 238-55.

Sharples, M. (1999). How we write. London: Routledge.

Shelley, M. & Schuh, J. H. (2001). Are the best higher education journals really the best? A meta-analysis of writing quality and readability. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 33(1), 11-22.

Smyth, T. R. (1996). Writing in psychology: A student guide. New York: Wiley.

Smyth. T. R. (2004). The principles of writing in psychology: London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sokal, A. D. (1996). Transgressing the boundaries: Towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text, 46/47 (Spring/Summer), 217-52.

Torrance, M. & Galbraith, D. (2006). The processing demands of writing. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 67-80). New York: Guilford Press.

Torrance, M., Thomas, G. V. & Robinson, E. J. (1994). The writing strategies of graduate researchers in the social sciences. Higher Education, 27, 379-92.

Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. H. C. (1953). A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171 (25 April), 737-8.

Wellington, J. (2003). Getting published: A guide for lecturers and researchers. London: Routledge.

Wengelin, A. (2007). The word-level focus in text production by adults with reading and writing difficulties. In M. Torrance, L. van Waes & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (pp. 67-82). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Woods, P. (1999). Successful writing for qualitative researchers. London: Routledge.

Was this article helpful?

0 0

Post a comment