that government funding of the Olympics has declined in the current era of low public financing and increased privatisation:
5. There is no other source of funds for the Olympics.
As we know, premises are, by themselves, unlikely to be well founded without some authority or further reasoning. So, at this stage, we can also add further layers to our diagram, providing more claims that show or explain our premises. We can add as many layers as we wish, though for practical reasons we might wish to stop at three or four layers (see below). In each case, remember that we are using the claim at the bottom of each vertical arrow as a conclusion, and so all of the thinking moves involved in making good links between the main conclusion and its main premises also apply to these relationships.
Again, claim 4 of the Olympics example—'Non-sport costs, associated with security and entertainment, are now much more prominent'—would need to be properly supported by its own explanation, which would involve a similar process in which we think of a reason and then break it down into specific claims. These supporting claims might be:
6. The Olympic games are now a prime target for terrorists.
7. Terrorism is common in the contemporary world.
8. Each new Olympic games tries to outdo the previous one in terms of entertainment and spectacle.
9. Every new and different approach to entertainment usually involves greater cost.
The fourth and fifth steps, which involved stopping, reflecting, and revising, are crucial. At this point we must think through the following questions, beginning also to relate our own reasoning to the context in which we are operating:
• What assumptions underlie the reasoning?
• Are there any implied premises?
Was this article helpful?
Get All The Support And Guidance You Need To Get The Money You Need For Your Business! This Book Is One Of The Most Valuable Resources In The World When It Comes To Tips On Negotiating With Venture Capitalists And The Government To Start A Huge Internet Business!