Answer briefly the following questions, giving, where possible, an example in your answer that is different from those used in this book:
a. How many reasons does a chain of dependent premises offer in support of a conclusion?
b. What is an implied premise?
c. What is the difference between the relevance and acceptability of a claim?
d. How might a framing premise be used in connection with relevance?
e. What role does the idea of well-founded claims play in relation to relevance and support?
f. What is the difference between depth and breadth of reasoning?
g. How can we use scope and certainty to judge the effectiveness of reasoning?
Was this article helpful?